ArticleeLife2026
Modality-agnostic decoding of vision and language from fMRI.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Representations in vision and language converge in a shared, multidimensional space of perceived similarities.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- A large-scale fMRI dataset for vision-language semantic association.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans perform tasks involving the manipulation of inputs regardless of how these signals are perceived by the brain, thanks to representations that are invariant to the stimulus modality. In this paper, we present modality-agnostic decoders that leverage such modality-invariant representations to predict which stimulus a subject is seeing, irrespective of the modality in which the stimulus is presented. Training these modality-agnostic decoders is made possible thanks to our new large-scale fMRI dataset SemReps-8K, released publicly along with this paper. It comprises six subjects watching both images and short text descriptions of such images, as well as the conditions during which the subjects were imagining visual scenes. We find that modality-agnostic decoders can perform as well as modality-specific decoders and even outperform them when decoding captions and mental imagery. Furthermore, a searchlight analysis revealed that large areas of the brain contain modality-invariant representations. Such areas are also particularly suitable for decoding visual scenes from the mental imagery condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.