Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995694›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2026

Narisara Paradee, Patcharaporn Saengratwatchara, Somdet Srichairatanakool, Pimpisid Koonyosying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Narisara ParadeeDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Patcharaporn SaengratwatcharaDepartment of Pre-Pharmacy Education, Faculty of Pharmacy, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Somdet SrichairatanakoolDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimpisid KoonyosyingDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextWound healing requires coordinated keratinocyte and fibroblast migration, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and growth factor signaling. Disruption of these processes delays repair and impairs skin integrity.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the phytochemical profile, antioxidant capacity, and wound-healing potential of MATERIALS &

methodsBCFE was prepared by ethanolic extraction and tentatively profiled using LC-QTOF/MS. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant capacity were determined using chemical assays, and intracellular ROS levels were measured in H

resultsLC-QTOF/MS tentatively identified gallic acid, epicatechin, rutin, quercetin, hesperetin, apigenin, and luteolin in BCFE. The extract had high phenolic (140.2 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid (8.3 mg QE/g) contents. BCFE exhibited DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging capacity (IC

conclusionsCollectively, BCFE promoted key cellular processes involved in wound repair, including antioxidant activity, wound closure, and collagen synthesis. These results support the potential role of

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBombaxFibroblastsKeratinocytesPlant ExtractsWound HealingDose-Response Relationship, DrugFlavonoidsFlowersHaCaT CellsHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsReactive Oxygen SpeciesantioxidantBombax ceibacollagen synthesiswound closurewound healing

Identifiers

PMID41995694
PMCPMC13094256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.