Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995693›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

From Care to Justice: Reframing Nursing Education Through Relational Ethics and Epistemic Inclusion.

Eunice K Assem-Erhaze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eunice K Assem-ErhazeCollege of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9587-6771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caring forms the philosophical and moral foundation of nursing, yet nursing education often reproduces the epistemic exclusion it professes to resist. Writing as a nursing educator and disability justice advocate, I employ philosophical hermeneutics and critical analysis to interpret nursing education through the intersecting frameworks of Noddings' ethics of care, critical disability theory, and Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. I argue that the faculty-student relationship functions as a moral microcosm in which nursing's ethical identity is either enacted or fractured, and that for students with learning disabilities, authentic caring requires a fundamental reorientation from benevolent provision to relational reciprocity. Through analysis of the hidden curriculum as a site of moral withdrawal, I develop the distinction between 'caring for' and 'caring with', proposing co-agency as the relational and institutional expression of genuine caring pedagogy. I further examine how bureaucratic structures and the feminized distribution of moral labour constrain relational care, and argue that structural reform is a moral necessity rather than a procedural adjustment. The paper concludes by integrating care and justice as mutually constitutive: justice is the structural expression of care, and care is the relational practice through which justice is enacted in everyday educational life. Caring pedagogy is not preparatory to ethical nursing practice; it is one of its earliest expressions.

Indexed as

Education, NursingEthics, NursingSocial JusticeCurriculumEmpathyHermeneuticsHumansPhilosophy, Nursingco‐agencydisability justiceepistemic justiceethics of carelearning disabilitiesnursing educationnursing philosophyrelational pedagogy

Identifiers

PMID41995693
PMCPMC13089328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.