ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Modernising functional independence measurement: Validation of a Contemporary Extended Activities of Daily Living scale in a mixed sample.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo validate a previously described 5-item short-form Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living and assess the properties of incorporating contemporary tasks to create a novel Contemporary Extended Activities of Daily Living scale.DesignValidation study.SettingConducted through an online questionnaire.ParticipantsAdults over 60 years of age, living with a chronic condition or receiving care, caregivers, and healthcare providers.Main measuresWe assessed internal consistency of each scale using Cronbach's alpha. Additionally, criterion validity and convergent validity of the short-form and contemporary scales were assessed using Spearman's correlation analyses with the original 22-item Nottingham scale, and with quality of life measured by the European Quality of Life 5-dimension scale.ResultsAcross 712 participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.