Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995621›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to Evaluate a Smoking Cessation Programme in Community Pharmacies.

Cheryn Coleman, Stuart G Ferguson, Rosie Nash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to Evaluate a Smoking Cessation Programme in Community Pharmacies.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheryn ColemanTasmanian School of Medicine, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-4540
Stuart G FergusonTasmanian School of Medicine, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7378-3497
Rosie NashTasmanian School of Medicine, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-0887

Funding

Tasmanian Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedTobacco smoking disproportionately affects people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Improving access to effective smoking cessation programmes and medications is crucial to reducing this gap. Here, we report on a programme trialling the provision of free nicotine replacement therapy to priority populations through community pharmacies.

methodsThis study evaluates the engagement and acceptability of this approach using a multiphase mixed methods design. Two groups were involved in the programme: community pharmacists (n = 8) and people who smoke cigarettes (n = 55). At the conclusion of the programme, 7 pharmacists and 10 smokers completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data collected through interviews were analysed using a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was performed first, followed by a deductive thematic analysis to code the data into the seven constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

resultsAnalyses revealed pharmacists and smokers were mostly positive about the pilot programme. Although the burden was perceived to be considerable by pharmacists, and the self-efficacy and opportunity costs appear to have limited the engagement of some smokers in the programme.

conclusionThis evaluation provides insights into what works to support people from priority populations who want to quit smoking. It highlights that both engagement with and acceptability of smoking cessation support are influenced by practical considerations and the service setting. Furthermore, it highlights the important role that existing health destinations, such as community pharmacies, can play in the delivery of public health interventions.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePharmaciesPharmacistsSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNicotine Replacement TherapyProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSmokersbehavioural supportcommunity pharmacyevidence based practicenicotine replacement therapysmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID41995621
PMCPMC13089091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.