Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995606›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026

Improving wheat tolerance to post-flowering heat using matched development stages and field-based reaction norms.

Muhammad Yahya, Najeeb Ullah, Jack Christopher, Daniel Cozzolino, Vincent Mellor, Glen Fox, Estelle Kuhn, Karine Chenu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad YahyaQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.
Najeeb UllahAgriculture Research Station, Office of VP for Research and Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-6775-3937
Jack ChristopherQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8873-1059
Daniel CozzolinoQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Vincent MellorSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.
Glen FoxDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Estelle KuhnUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Karine ChenuQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-2057

Funding

Advance Queensland FellowAustralian Research CouncilQueensland GovernmentResearch Training Programthe Queensland Department of Primary Industries QueenslandThe University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-flowering heatwaves impact individual grain weight (IGW) and grain quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Here, the effect of post-flowering heatwaves on IGW, yield, and grain protein content (GPC) were examined in 25 wheat genotypes grown in irrigated field trials across locations, seasons and sowing dates. The photoperiod-extension method (PEM) was employed with measurements on individual spikes to synchronize flowering among genotypes, ensuring heat impacts were assessed at similar developmental stages. Adjacent to most PEM trials, genotypes were cultivated in machine-harvested field plots to evaluate crop performance using a more conventional screening method. Heat stress significantly reduced IGW and increased GPC in PEM trials, with impacts not as clearly discernible in conventional plots. Across genotypes and traits, heat responses (slope of the reaction norms) were negatively correlated with trait values observed in non-stressed conditions (intercept). The level of heat stress each genotype could endure before reaching critical IGW (30 mg), yield (250 g m-2), or GPC (15%) thresholds revealed high genotypic variability and highly tolerant genotypes. The findings provide insights for improving heat responses in crop models and enhancing genotype selection for climate-resilient breeding.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureThermotoleranceTriticumEdible GrainFlowersGenotypeCerealclimate changecrop adaptationgenotypic variationglobal warminggrain fillingheat stressthousand grain weight

Identifiers

PMID41995606
PMCPMC13577760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.