Observational studyMedicine2026
Comparative effectiveness of vancomycin and fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea: A single-center experience in Taiwan.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has become an increasingly common healthcare-associated infection worldwide. Although both vancomycin and fidaxomicin are approved for treatment, real-world comparative data from Taiwan remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vancomycin and fidaxomicin in treating CDAD and to identify patients at risk of treatment failure who may benefit from fecal microbiota transplantation. This single-center retrospective observational study was conducted at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital from January 2018 to August 2020. Adult patients (≥20 years) diagnosed with CDAD and treated with oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily) and/or fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily) for 10 days were included. Treatment success and failure rates were compared between groups, and associations with age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were analyzed using a Student t test and chi-square test, with significance defined as P ≤ .05. A total of 166 patients were analyzed (mean age = 72.36 ± 14.72 years; mean CCI = 6.80 ± 2.61). Of these, 161 received vancomycin and 48 received fidaxomicin. The treatment success rate was 53.4% for vancomycin and 79.2% for fidaxomicin. Among vancomycin-treated patients, treatment failure was significantly associated with older age (P = .009) and higher CCI (P = .004). No statistically significant associations were observed for fidaxomicin outcomes with age, sex, and CCI. Fidaxomicin demonstrated superior clinical effectiveness to vancomycin, particularly among older adults and patients with multiple comorbidities. These findings support prioritizing fidaxomicin for high-risk patients and considering fecal microbiota transplantation in refractory cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.