Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995549›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Predictive factors for the development of urethral stricture in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A retrospective study.

Ferec Efendioğlu, Cihat Özcan, Zafer Tokatli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ferec EfendioğluDepartment of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cihat ÖzcanDepartment of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1168-5503
Zafer TokatliDepartment of Urology, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of urethral stricture after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and to assess the safety of the procedure. We retrospectively reviewed data from 202 patients who underwent HoLEP. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with urethral stricture (group 2) and those without (group 1). Preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry with post-void residual (PVR), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of urethral stricture. Perioperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. The mean age was 67.0 ± 7.6 years in group 1 and 68.4 ± 7.3 years in group 2 (P = .335). Urethral stricture developed in 6.4% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative prostatitis (odds ratio [OR]: 116.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-10,330; P = .047) and the use of general anesthesia (OR: 269.07; 95% CI: 7.30-9912.74; P = .047) were independent predictors of stricture formation. Preoperative prostatitis and general anesthesia significantly increase the risk of urethral stricture after HoLEP.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaUrethral StrictureAgedHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsProstate-Specific Antigenbenign prostatic obstructionholmium laser enucleation of the prostateprostate resectionprostate specific antigenurethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID41995549
PMCPMC13095305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.