ArticleMedicine2026
Centralized equipment allocation in a large tertiary hospital: Operational and economic outcomes of a hub-based coordination model.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equipment utilization in hospitals often remains below 60% due to departmental fragmentation and information asymmetry. Hospitals of all sizes face pressure to optimize equipment investments, yet coordinated sharing mechanisms remain underutilized. We evaluated an equipment allocation center (EAC) that combines centralized coordination with economic incentives to improve equipment sharing across departments. We analyzed equipment sharing data from a 560-bed tertiary hospital in eastern China for the calendar year 2024. The EAC maintains 120 pooled devices while providing real-time tracking of 1367 items across 29 clinical departments. An economic mechanism charges borrowing departments depreciation-based fees while crediting lending departments with 80% of these fees as revenue. We assessed operational performance, network topology, and economic outcomes stratified by department size and specialty. The EAC coordinated 1558 equipment transactions with 100% departmental participation. Equipment utilization improved from 52.3% to 78.6%, a gain of 26.3 percentage points. Average response time was 40 minutes for routine requests; emergency fulfillment reached 98.5%. Annual direct benefits totaled 1.36 million Chinese Yuan (CNY), with estimated procurement avoidance of 5.09 million CNY. The network showed hub-spoke topology; without the central hub, 17 of 29 departments would lose sharing access entirely. Small departments achieved the highest benefit-per-bed ratios: the intensive care unit with 16 beds realized 5600 CNY per bed annually. Centralized equipment coordination with economic incentives markedly improves utilization and yields considerable financial returns. The model particularly benefits smaller departments by enabling equipment access without ownership requirements. Hub-based architecture creates operational efficiency but also coordination dependency requiring contingency planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.