Trial reportMedicine2026
Integration of the ISO 15189 quality management system in the undergraduate internship teaching of medical laboratory technology.
Trial report in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard is essential for quality management in clinical laboratories, yet its integration into undergraduate medical laboratory technology education remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a simulated laboratory teaching model based on the ISO 15189 standard on the quality management competencies of undergraduate interns and to compare it with traditional teaching methods.
methodsA parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Clinical Laboratory at the Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province). A total of 60 undergraduate medical laboratory technology students scheduled to commence their clinical clerkship between July 2023 and May 2025 were enrolled and randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30). The intervention group received simulated laboratory teaching based on the ISO 15189 standard, including the construction of a quality management system and full-process simulated accreditation practice. The control group received traditional clinical clerkship teaching. Primary outcome measures were comprehensive assessment scores at the end of the internship (covering pre-examination, intra-examination, and post-examination quality control knowledge) and problem-solving ability scores in quality management roles. Secondary outcome measures included understanding of the quality management system, quality improvement awareness, and teaching satisfaction.
resultsCompared with the control group, the intervention group showed significantly higher scores in pre-examination quality control, intra-examination quality control, post-examination quality control, understanding of the quality management system, quality improvement awareness, and problem-solving ability in quality management roles (P < .01). Teaching feedback questionnaires also indicated higher satisfaction with the teaching model in the intervention group.
conclusionFor undergraduate medical laboratory technology interns, the simulated laboratory teaching model based on the ISO 15189 standard is significantly more effective than traditional teaching methods in enhancing their knowledge, skills, and competency in quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.