Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995389›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

Neighborhood-level socioeconomic position and mortality among children born with critical congenital heart defects.

Sanjida J Mowla, Chantel L Martin, Jeanette A Stingone, Thomas J Luben, Nina E Forestieri, Matthew E Oster, Elizabeth C Ailes, Shannon Pruitt Evans, Sarah C Fisher, Paul A Romitti and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sanjida J MowlaDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Chantel L MartinDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Jeanette A StingoneDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Thomas J LubenDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Nina E ForestieriBirth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Matthew E OsterDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Elizabeth C AilesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities ,  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Shannon Pruitt EvansDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities ,  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Sarah C FisherBirth Defects Registry ,  New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, United States.
Paul A RomittiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Suzan L CarmichaelDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Philip J LupoDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Anne Marie DarlingMassachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health and Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Funding

Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
ACL HHS U01DD001308CDC cooperative agreements PA #96043, PA #02081, FOA #DD09-001, FOA #DD13-003, NOFO #DD18-001, and NOFO #DD23-001EPA EP-D-18-001HSRD VA CDP 13-003Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001308NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the North Carolina Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill U01DD001308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the role of neighborhood-level socioeconomic position (nSEP) in 1- and 5-year survival among children with critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs). Children with CCHDs in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (1999-2011) were grouped into univentricular and biventricular defects and linked to vital records for 1- and 5-year mortality. The Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) was used to classify census-tract nSEP (low [referent], moderate, high deprivation) using maternal periconceptional address. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate survival differences. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for birth years, maternal sociodemographic factors, and residential mobility. Among 2459 children with CCHDs, 1 year survival curves differed by neighborhood deprivation. Survival was lowest among children of mothers living in high- vs low-deprivation neighborhoods. In crude analyses, high deprivation was associated with higher 1-year mortality (all CCHDs: 1.58 [1.17, 2.13]; univentricular CCHDs: 1.50 [0.99, 2.26]; biventricular CCHDs: 1.64 [1.02, 2.64]). After adjustment, estimates were generally attenuated and less precise. Five-year survival showed similar trends. Further research could inform strategies to address the structural, environmental, and/or physiological factors associated with a potential reduced survival among children with CCHDs born to mothers in socioeconomically deprived areas.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsSocial ClassChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLow Socioeconomic StatusMaleProportional Hazards ModelsSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesCCHD severitycritical congenital heart defectsearly childhood mortalityinfant mortalityneighborhood deprivationsocioeconomic disparitysurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41995389
PMCPMC13678503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.