ReviewNeural plasticity2026
Immediate Consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury During Development: Unique Insights From Ex Vivo Models.
Review in Neural plasticity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immediate Consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury During Development: Unique Insights From Ex Vivo Models.Neural plasticity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past 40 years, increasing demand for spinal cord injury (SCI) repair strategies has driven extensive research, yet critical recovery mechanisms remain poorly understood. Key gaps include the temporary loss of spinal reflexes during spinal shock and the dynamics of "injury potentials," which spread rapidly from the impact site, similar to cortical spreading depression (CSD). While traditionally spinal shock has been viewed as unavoidable, targeted interventions could potentially mitigate SCI pathology and improve recovery. Additionally, immediate changes in brain circuitry post-SCI remain debated, with limited markers for assessing early neuronal and glial damage. Early supraspinal biomarkers, including neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S-100β, and microRNAs, may further refine injury severity assessments. The potential for spontaneous spinal circuit repair is often underestimated, yet molecular evidence suggests preserved interneuronal networks may support functional reconnections. Pediatric SCIs show superior self-repair, highlighting unique plasticity mechanisms that could be leveraged for therapeutic benefit. While in vivo models mimic human pathology, ex vivo neonatal rodent models allow continuous electrophysiological recordings of spontaneous and evoked neuronal activity during SCI, revealing how lumbar locomotor circuits integrate afferent input post-injury. Using an ex vivo neonatal SCI model, we demonstrate real-time network changes in the brain and spinal cord. Our model enables modulation of the extracellular ionic environment and afferent stimulation. By integrating ex vivo models, molecular biomarkers, and insights from early developmental stages, we can uncover novel mechanisms of an acute SCI or refine neuromodulatory strategies to promote recovery of functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.