ArticleChild: care, health and development2026
Exploring Health Care Providers, Families and Educators' Perceptions of an Online Self-Paced F-Words for Child Development Foundations Course.
Article in Child: care, health and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Service provider perspectives on implementing the 'F-words for child development': an innovative approach to children's health and developmental services.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Child health services research with the people who know best: experiences and lessons from CanChild's collaborations with families.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe F-words for Child Development (Functioning, Family, Fitness, Fun, Friendships and Future) offer a holistic, strengths-based and family-centred approach to child development, rooted in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Interest in the F-words has grown significantly among families, health care providers, educators and researchers, creating the need for accessible and scalable training to support dissemination and implementation efforts.
methodsA self-paced online F-words Foundations Course was co-developed by families, health care providers, educators and researchers. The course consists of five 1-h modules covering the F-words approach, personal stories, goal-setting and practical strategies for integrating the F-words into daily life and practice. This study evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, usability and utility of the course through an online survey that included Likert-scaled and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed through content analysis.
resultsFifty-five participants, including families, health care providers and educators from Ontario, completed an online survey assessing their experience. Findings were positive, with participants rating the course as useful in understanding the F-words (85%), accessible and easy to engage with (91%) and valuable in helping them achieve their learning goals (85%). Participants valued the multimedia components, particularly videos featuring individuals with lived experience, and appreciated the course's family-centred perspective. Suggested improvements included increasing interactivity (e.g., use of discussion boards and synchronous group sessions) and shortening the length or removing repetition in course content.
conclusionThe F-words Foundations Course is a free, accessible and online training tool that effectively supports increasing knowledge, awareness and use of the F-words in life and practice. Future directions include expanding course offerings for young individuals and exploring facilitated formats to enhance engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.