ArticleLeukemia research reports2026
Machine learning models in predictive factors for megaloblastic character of macrocytic anemia.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Differentiating megaloblastic from non-megaloblastic macrocytic anemia usually relies on vitamin B12 and/or B9 assessment and bone marrow examination. In resource-limited regions, these diagnostic tools are not readily available. This study aims to develop a machine learning model to distinguish between these two forms of macrocytic anemia using commonly accessible clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A logistic regression model was developed using a dataset containing clinical features and routine laboratory data. Key predictive variables were identified through the SequentialFeatureSelector. The model was optimized using GridSearchCV and validated through stratified 5-fold cross-validation to ensure robust performance. Results: ESR, glossitis, and MCHC were the most influential variables in predicting non-megaloblastic anemia, with respective importance percentages of 23.11 %, 22.07 %, and 13.87 %. Other variables such as LDH (13.77 %), aregenerative status (13.42 %), and limb paresthesia (11.78 %) also contributed significantly to the model, while MCV had a comparatively lower importance (1.98 %). The model demonstrated a high discriminatory ability, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.92 and an overall accuracy of 94 %. Learning curve analysis confirmed its stability and consistent performance across varying data sizes. Conclusions: By reducing dependence on specialized diagnostic tests and invasive procedures, this approach is particularly suited for resource-constrained healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.