Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994810›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Lumbar Interbody Cages: Design Characteristics, Biomaterials, Biomechanical Performance, Clinical Challenges, and Emerging Innovations.

Adrian-Valentin Enache, Antonio-Daniel Corlatescu, Horia-Petre Costin, Alexandru Vladimir Ciurea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrian-Valentin EnacheDoctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.
Antonio-Daniel CorlatescuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.
Horia-Petre CostinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.
Alexandru Vladimir CiureaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar interbody cages have evolved significantly in recent decades through advances in biomaterials, geometric design, and surface modifications, all aimed at improving fusion and reducing complications. However, issues such as subsidence, migration, and pseudarthrosis continue to pose significant challenges in spinal practice. This narrative review synthesizes current data on lumbar cage design, biomaterials used, biomechanical performance, clinical outcomes, and recent innovations. Current evidence suggests that 3D-printed porous titanium implants achieve higher fusion rates than polyetheretherketone and are associated with lower rates of subsidence and reintervention, although differences in patient-reported clinical outcomes remain small. Expandable cages offer radiographic advantages, especially in the restoration of disc height, but without a clear clinical superiority over static ones. Overall, the choice of material, implant geometry, and surface properties significantly influence the performance of the cage. Innovations such as additive manufacturing, porous architectures, customized implants, and bioactive surfaces are promising, but long-term prospective studies are needed to more clearly define their role in individualized implant selection.

Indexed as

3d-printed titaniumexpandable cageslumbar fusionlumbar interbody cagesosseointegrationpeekspinal implantssubsidence

Identifiers

PMID41994810
PMCPMC13080220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.