ArticleCureus2026
Levetiracetam and Rhabdomyolysis: A Rare but Clinically Significant Adverse Effect.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Levetiracetam (Keppra) is an antiepileptic medication known for its relatively safe side effect profile. While rhabdomyolysis represents an uncommon adverse reaction to Keppra, with only limited case reports in the literature, the relationship between levetiracetam dosage and rhabdomyolysis risk remains poorly characterized. This case report describes a patient who developed rhabdomyolysis in apparent correlation with levetiracetam dose. We present a 29-year-old African American male with no significant past medical history who presented to the emergency department following a witnessed seizure. He had experienced two similar episodes several months prior, for which levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily was initiated. The patient reported full adherence to his prescribed medication regimen. Physical examination revealed no significant abnormalities aside from evidence of tongue laceration. Laboratory investigations demonstrated therapeutic levetiracetam levels (26 mcg/mL), creatine phosphokinase (CPK) of 2,835 IU/L, and mildly elevated serum creatinine (1.27 mg/dL). The levetiracetam dosage was subsequently increased to 750 mg twice daily. On day 1 following dose escalation, CPK levels nearly quadrupled to 10,116 IU/L despite aggressive fluid resuscitation, and further rose to 14,400 IU/L on day 2 with concurrent worsening of renal function. Given concern that the increased levetiracetam dose may be contributory, the medication was withheld for one day and then resumed at the original home dose. Despite continued fluid resuscitation, CPK levels continued to rise, reaching a peak of 22,904 IU/L on day 5 before beginning to decline on day 6. By day 7 of hospitalization, CPK levels had decreased substantially. The patient was discharged on day 8 once CPK levels had reached a nadir and was referred to neurology for ongoing management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.