Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994700›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Family Medicine and Emergency Physicians' Perceptions of Inappropriate Emergency Room Use in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Najlaa M Alsudairy, Deemah A Altashkandi, Alaa O Alahdal, Fatmah S Baqar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Najlaa M AlsudairyDepartment of Family Medicine, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Deemah A AltashkandiDepartment of Family Medicine, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Alaa O AlahdalDepartment of Family Medicine, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Fatmah S BaqarCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate emergency room (ER) utilization for nonurgent conditions is increasingly recognized as a challenge for health systems, contributing to crowding, delays in care, and increased healthcare costs. Physicians working in emergency and primary care settings may have different perspectives on the magnitude, causes, and consequences of this problem. This study assessed physicians' perceptions of inappropriate ER utilization in Saudi Arabia and compared perspectives between family medicine and emergency medicine physicians.

methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional, web-based survey of family medicine and emergency medicine physicians practicing in Saudi Arabia in January and February 2026. The questionnaire assessed perceptions of inappropriate ER use, perceived contributing factors, and perceived impacts on care delivery and workforce outcomes. Comparisons between specialties were performed using chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with reporting that at least half of ER visits were inappropriate.

resultsA total of 412 physicians completed the survey, including 214 family medicine physicians (51.9%) and 198 emergency physicians (48.1%). Overall, 352 physicians (85.4%) agreed that inappropriate ER use is a major national problem. A large proportion of physicians reported that many ER visits are nonurgent (n=334, 81.1%) and could be managed in primary care settings (n=318, 77.2%). Emergency physicians were more likely than family physicians to report that ER visits are frequently nonurgent (174 of 198 (87.9%) vs. 160 of 214 (74.8%), P<0.001) and manageable in primary care (176 of 198 (88.9%) vs. 142 of 214 (66.4%), P<0.001). Limited access to primary care was identified as a contributing factor by 304 physicians (73.8%), and after-hours service gaps by 286 (69.4%). A total of 346 physicians (84.0%) agreed that inappropriate ER use delays care for critically ill patients, and 328 (79.6%) agreed that it negatively affects patient safety. In multivariable analysis, emergency physicians were more likely than family physicians to report that at least half of ER visits were inappropriate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-3.31; P=0.001). Perceived weaknesses in the referral system (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.84-4.19; P<0.001) and limited primary care access (aOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.23-2.91; P=0.004) were also independently associated with this perception.

conclusionIn this survey of physicians in Saudi Arabia, inappropriate ER utilization was widely perceived as common and consequential for healthcare delivery. Emergency physicians were more likely than family physicians to characterize ER visits as frequently inappropriate and to report negative impacts on patient safety and care delivery. Strengthening primary care access and referral systems may help reduce nonurgent ER visits and improve the efficiency of emergency services.

Indexed as

crowdingemergency medicineemergency room utilizationfamily medicinehealthcare costsnonurgent carepatient safetyprimary carereferral systemssaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID41994700
PMCPMC13081124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.