ReviewCureus2026
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Within a Structured Secondary Prevention Framework in Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative aortic stenosis represents a frequent and clinically significant manifestation of systemic cardiovascular disease, sharing common risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms with atherosclerosis, including chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and calcific remodeling. Its frequent coexistence with comorbid conditions such as coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, and therapeutic complexity. In recent years, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as a cornerstone therapy for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis across a wide spectrum of surgical risk, offering substantial improvements in hemodynamic performance, functional status, and quality of life. This review examines transcatheter aortic valve replacement within the context of secondary cardiovascular prevention. While the procedure effectively corrects valvular obstruction, it does not directly modify the systemic atherosclerotic and metabolic processes that drive long-term cardiovascular risk. Emphasis is placed on comprehensive preprocedural evaluation, including multimodality imaging with transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography, and transesophageal echocardiography, which together support accurate phenotyping, risk stratification, and procedural planning as determinants of downstream outcomes. Beyond procedural success, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with favorable effects on cardiovascular prognosis, including reductions in heart failure-related hospitalizations. However, as survival improves, residual cardiovascular risk increasingly reflects the impact of systemic comorbidities and myocardial vulnerability rather than valve-related pathology alone. This shift underscores the need for structured secondary prevention strategies following the intervention. Optimal long-term management therefore requires aggressive control of cardiovascular risk factors, guideline-directed medical therapy, individualized antithrombotic strategies, and structured follow-up integrating prosthetic valve surveillance with ongoing cardiovascular risk reduction. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement should be viewed not as a secondary prevention therapy in isolation, but as a pivotal structural intervention embedded within a broader, longitudinal cardiovascular prevention framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.