ArticleCureus2026
Meal Frequency and Body Composition in Obese Adults Presenting for a Weight-Loss Program: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeal frequency takes a large focus when people enter a weight-loss program.
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to compare fat percentage and muscle percentage across three self-reported meal-frequency patterns, including small frequent meals (SFM), three regular meals (3RM), and three large meals (3LM), in adults with obesity enrolled in a weight-loss program at Louis Pasteur Hospital between November 2022 and June 2024. We hypothesized that meal frequency would not be associated with differences in body-composition outcomes after adjustment for age and sex.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of 320 patients with obesity presenting to a program for weight loss. Body mass composition was obtained, and fat and muscle percentages were calculated. Differences were compared based on meal frequency using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) while adjusting for age and sex.
resultsA total of 320 patients were included, with meal frequency distributed as SFM (n = 153), 3RM (n = 95), and 3LM (n = 70). The mean fat percentage was 47.1, 46.3, and 46.1 (p = 0.586) for SFM, 3RM, and 3LM, respectively. The mean muscle percentage was calculated as 49.4, 51, and 51.1 (p = 0.142) for SFM, 3RM, and 3LM, respectively.
conclusionEating pattern is not associated with altered body mass composition in patients presenting for weight loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.