Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994636›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Advances in ultrasound for preoperative molecular subtyping of malignant breast tumors.

Dao-Rong Hong, Chun-Yan Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dao-Rong Hong *Department of Ultrasonography, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Chun-Yan Huang *Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer molecular subtyping (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative) guides systemic therapy selection and prognostication, yet is still determined primarily by invasive tissue sampling. Over the last decade, ultrasound has progressed from descriptive B-mode signs to quantitative vascular, mechanical, and computational phenotyping intended to support preoperative subtype inference and biomarker-related risk stratification. This review synthesizes recent advances in conventional ultrasound feature analysis, elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), microvascular imaging, radiomics, and deep learning, with emphasis on methodological rigor, interpretability, and clinical translation. Across cohorts, vascularity-related signals (CEUS perfusion metrics and superb microvascular imaging vascular index), stiffness measurements from shear-wave elastography, and multiparametric machine-learning models repeatedly show subtype-discriminative potential. However, heterogeneity in reference standards, single-center retrospective designs, class imbalance, and limited external validation remain major barriers. We outline a roadmap toward clinically deployable ultrasound-based subtyping-prioritizing standardized acquisition, prospective multicenter evaluation, uncertainty-aware and interpretable AI, and multimodal integration with clinicopathologic and genomic context. Importantly, subtype separability should be interpreted as probabilistic discrimination of operational labels rather than biological determinism; mechanistic origins remain largely unknown and require dedicated radiologic-pathologic/radiogenomic validation.

Indexed as

breast ultrasoundcontrast-enhanced ultrasounddeep learningelastographyHER2luminalmolecular subtyperadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41994636
PMCPMC13078971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.