ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Advances in ultrasound for preoperative molecular subtyping of malignant breast tumors.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer molecular subtyping (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative) guides systemic therapy selection and prognostication, yet is still determined primarily by invasive tissue sampling. Over the last decade, ultrasound has progressed from descriptive B-mode signs to quantitative vascular, mechanical, and computational phenotyping intended to support preoperative subtype inference and biomarker-related risk stratification. This review synthesizes recent advances in conventional ultrasound feature analysis, elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), microvascular imaging, radiomics, and deep learning, with emphasis on methodological rigor, interpretability, and clinical translation. Across cohorts, vascularity-related signals (CEUS perfusion metrics and superb microvascular imaging vascular index), stiffness measurements from shear-wave elastography, and multiparametric machine-learning models repeatedly show subtype-discriminative potential. However, heterogeneity in reference standards, single-center retrospective designs, class imbalance, and limited external validation remain major barriers. We outline a roadmap toward clinically deployable ultrasound-based subtyping-prioritizing standardized acquisition, prospective multicenter evaluation, uncertainty-aware and interpretable AI, and multimodal integration with clinicopathologic and genomic context. Importantly, subtype separability should be interpreted as probabilistic discrimination of operational labels rather than biological determinism; mechanistic origins remain largely unknown and require dedicated radiologic-pathologic/radiogenomic validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.