ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Understanding medical professionalism in Italy-welfare regimes, regulatory models, paths to medical professionalization/professionalism, and gender inclusion.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a theoretical interpretation of the transformation of medical professionalism in Italy by integrating four analytical dimensions that are often examined separately: welfare regimes, healthcare regulatory models, professionalization pathways/models of professionalism, and gender inclusion. Drawing on comparative welfare state theory and the sociology of professions, the study argues that medical professionalism in Italy has historically developed within a complex institutional configuration characterized by the interaction of state, market, and community coordination mechanisms. Using a historical-figurational perspective, the article shows how the relative weakness of both state regulation and healthcare markets fostered the emergence of clan-based forms of professional coordination, as conceptualized by Ouchi. These relational networks-rooted in academic, political, associative, and community ties-have played a central role in structuring access to careers, economic and political resources, and professional status. The creation of the Italian National Health Service in 1978 introduced a universalistic institutional framework. Still, subsequent reforms, austerity policies, and the expansion of private healthcare have reinforced rather than displaced these particular governance arrangements. At the same time, the progressive feminization of the medical profession and generational change are reshaping professional hierarchies and leadership patterns. The Italian case thus offers a useful lens for understanding how historically stratified institutional contexts influence the contemporary transformation of medical professionalism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.