ReviewFrontiers in sociology2026
From reflexivity to anti-reflexivity: climate change polarization in the United States.
Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change is an urgent issue that experts across disciplines and borders have been attempting to bring to the forefront of public discussion for decades. Understanding the socio-political and ideological factors influencing public perspectives on climate change has become critical in modernity, where reflexivity-the vigilance and response to environmental risk-and its counterforce, anti-reflexivity, shape how individuals and institutions react to climate change. There has been little synthesis of the empirical literature on reflexivity and anti-reflexivity regarding American public perceptions of anthropogenic climate change. It is crucial to initiate dialogue among these empirical pursuits. This paper responds to this call by analyzing the empirical literature on reflexivity and anti-reflexivity in relation to perspectives on climate change. This analysis concludes with a conceptual framework and pathways for future research, contributing to the discussion of public attitudes toward climate change in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.