ArticleJMIR neurotechnology2026
A Pocket Laboratory for Functional Neuroimaging Research Using Mobile Visual Oddball, Multimodal Electroencephalography, and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Imaging: Instrument Validation Study.
Article in JMIR neurotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The need to observe brain activity in more natural environments, that is, outside of laboratory settings, is critical for understanding cognition. Wearable low-cost neuroimaging modalities (electroencephalography [EEG] and functional near-infrared spectroscopy [fNIRS]) are portable, noninvasive, and robust to motion artifacts but lack similarly portable tools for use in ecologically valid studies. Smartphones are ubiquitous, programmable, wireless, and thus strong candidates for "pocket laboratories" companion platforms that travel with study subjects. Therefore, we developed the Wearable Cognitive Assessment and Augmentation Toolkit (WearCAAT), a cross-platform neuroimaging task platform that integrates external sensors via the lab streaming layer (LSL) and supports over 100 sensor types. We validated our implementation with healthy human participants under multimodal neuroimaging conditions prior to analysis of data collection in ongoing clinical settings. Objective: This study aimed to validate WearCAAT, as a platform for functional neuroimaging research, via analysis of human participant data collected during our ongoing National Institutes of Health-funded study. Methods: We analyzed data from healthy college-aged (ages 18-30 y) adult participants, who completed a battery of shortened neurocognitive tasks (each lasting 4 min) in WearCAAT, while outfitted with research-grade multimodal EEG and fNIRS sensors. We indicated validity via the presence of task-related behavioral responses and their neuroimaging correlates. As a representative example, we analyzed the visual oddball task due to its well-documented poststimulus features for EEG and fNIRS. We extracted behavioral responses, mean response accuracies, and response times for infrequent (target) and frequent (standard) stimuli classes. We examined, poststimulus, P300, positive amplitude deflection around 300 (ms) in EEG and increased average oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) levels in fNIRS. Results: We enrolled a total of 57 (male individuals: n=27, 47%; female individuals: n=30, 53%; mean age 22, SD 3.4 y) participants for data collection. We excluded the first 4 (7%) participants from our analysis due to technical errors. Our analysis revealed increased mean response times for infrequent (target) stimuli (mean 718, SD 148 ms) compared to frequent (standard) stimuli (mean 542, SD 122 ms) with the Wilcoxon test (Z=6.33; Conclusions: WearCAAT-provided outcomes from our study, which analyzed multimodal neuroimaging data collected during a mobile app-based visual oddball task, matched expectations from the literature. While full validation is ongoing for other tasks, we demonstrated initial validity of our app for neurocognitive imaging use. Our app and approach represent the first attempt at dedicated neuroimaging mobile-pocket laboratory and contribute to greater studies in ecological validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.