Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Spiking neural networks provide accurate and time-efficient models for whisker stimulus classification of the awake mouse.

Steffen Albrecht, Jens R Vandevelde, Edoardo Vecchi, Gabriele Berra, Davide Bassetti, Maik C Stüttgen, Heiko J Luhmann, Illia Horenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steffen AlbrechtInstitute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jens R VandeveldeInstitute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Edoardo VecchiUndergraduate Education (FBDTI), Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Lugano-Viganello, Switzerland.
Gabriele BerraUndergraduate Education (FBDTI), Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Lugano-Viganello, Switzerland.
Davide BassettiDepartment of Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Maik C StüttgenInstitute of Pathophysiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Heiko J LuhmannInstitute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Illia HorenkoDepartment of Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms have great potential for classifying brain activity, and lightweight classifier algorithms, requiring little computational resources, can be used on low-energy neuromorphic hardware designed for implantable neuroprosthetics. One of these efficient algorithms, the Liquid State Machine, implements the concept of Spiking Neural Networks and has been shown to achieve outstanding results on the task of whisker stimulus detection from the mouse barrel cortex, a widely used model system. While this is promising for neuroprosthetics, it has been unclear how a Spiking Neural Network or other machine learning algorithms perform on data recorded from awake mice and how trained models generalize across individuals, the latter being relevant to transferring trained models to new hardware. Using laminar multi-electrode local field potential recordings obtained from four mice performing a single-whisker detection task, we benchmarked the performance of a collection of lightweight classification algorithms. We found that the Liquid State Machine, a generalized linear model, and the time series classifier ROCKET are the most accurate for stimulus detection. Among those, the Liquid State Machine achieved the fastest model training and inference runtime and provided robust accuracy across individual mice. Additional analyses show that there is no significant improvement in using multiple cortical layers as input for the model and that 40 ms of stimulus recording is sufficient to maintain high detection accuracy.

Indexed as

electrophysiologylocal field potentialmachine learningneural prosthesisneuroprostheticsspiking neural networkswhisker stimulus classification

Identifiers

PMID41994573
PMCPMC13079647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.