Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994551›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical robotics research2026

Clinical validation of a Novel Robotic Device for MR-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Initial Patient Experience.

Pedro Moreira, Mariana C Bernardes, John Grimble, Nicusor Iftimia, Kemal Tuncali, Jesung Park, Junichi Tokuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical robotics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro MoreiraDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, USA.
Mariana C BernardesDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, USA.
John GrimblePhysical Science Inc., 20 New England Business Center Dr, Andover, MA, USA.
Nicusor IftimiaPhysical Science Inc., 20 New England Business Center Dr, Andover, MA, USA.
Kemal TuncaliDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, USA.
Jesung ParkPhysical Science Inc., 20 New England Business Center Dr, Andover, MA, USA.
Junichi TokudaDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Oliver Jonas · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
Adaptive Percutaneous Prostate Interventions using Sensorized NeedleR01CA235134 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nobuhiko Hata, IULIAN IOAN IORDACHITA · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
Physician Assistance Technology in Image-guided Robotic Intervention of ProstateR01EB030539 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HATA, NOBUHIKO, ZHANG, HAICHONG · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
Smart template for prostate biopsy guidanceR44CA224853 · NCI · PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC · PI PARK, JESUNG · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235134NCI NIH HHS R44 CA224853NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transperineal targeted prostate biopsy has potential to provide precise cancer diagnosis. However, it is challenged by targeting errors and needle deflection. The main issue is that the traditional needle guides have limited degrees of freedom (DoF) and therefore restrict insertion path options. Thus, the targeting error can be larger than 5 mm. This study evaluates the performance of a custom-built 4-DoF needle guiding device designed to enable alternative insertion paths. The 4-DoF Smart Template was designed to improve image quality and stability, including redesigned fiducials and titanium positioning frames. Four MRI-guided biopsy cases were conducted. Targets were identified on T2-weighted images, and insertion paths were planned and adjusted to avoid critical structures. The targeting error was measured as the in-plane distance between the target and the actual needle position. The average targeting error of the best insertion attempt was 3.7mm±2.6mm (mean ± standard deviation). When discarding the case where the device had to be removed due to patient anatomy, the average targeting error was reduced to 2.7mm±1.1mm. No adverse events were reported. The new 4-DoF Smart Template device has demonstrated improved accuracy as compared to the traditional needle guide device, successfully reaching the target location with just one insertion in four out of six targets.

Indexed as

MRI-compatible robotsMRI-guided proceduresProstate biopsyrobot-assisted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41994551
PMCPMC13082751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.