Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994545›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Optimizing the use of adsorbent resin for the amelioration of smoke tainted wine.

Yiming Huo, Renata Ristic, David Wollan, Manuella Cazelato Pires, Lukas Gerstweiler, Richard Muhlack, Markus Herderich, Kerry Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiming HuoDiscipline of Wine Science, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Renata RisticDiscipline of Wine Science, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
David WollanVAF Memstar, PO Box 794, Nuriootpa, SA 5355, Australia.
Manuella Cazelato PiresSchool of Chemical Engineering, Adelaide University, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Lukas GerstweilerSchool of Chemical Engineering, Adelaide University, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Richard MuhlackDiscipline of Wine Science, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Markus HerderichWaite Research Institute, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Kerry WilkinsonDiscipline of Wine Science, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most effective strategies for amelioration of smoke tainted wine involve removal of smoke taint compounds (i.e., free and glycosylated phenols) by adsorbent materials. Ideally, adsorbents can be re-used if taint compounds are subsequently desorbed via a regeneration process. However, a recent study found phenolic glycosides carried over between remedial treatments that used adsorbent styrene-divinylbenzene resin (packed in a fixed-bed column), despite resin regeneration. This suggested inadequate regeneration, such that residual taint compounds remained on the resin. This study optimized resin regeneration by comparing the desorption of free and glycosylated phenols using different eluents, i.e.: aqueous sodium hydroxide vs aqueous sodium carbonate and aqueous ethanol vs aqueous isopropanol. Free and glycosylated phenols were effectively desorbed (i.e., >99% and 82-100% desorption, respectively, with no evidence of carryover) when resin was regenerated with 5 bed volumes of 2% sodium hydroxide, followed by 3-5 bed volumes of either 20% ethanol or isopropanol. Subsequent elution of regenerated resin with model wine (12% aqueous ethanol, pH 3.4) confirmed there was no further desorption (carryover) of smoke taint compounds. Following optimization of resin regeneration, nanofiltration and resin treatments were applied to three wines with varying levels of smoke taint. Analysis of untreated and treated wines demonstrated the efficacy of both amelioration and resin regeneration, i.e., ∼50% volatile phenol removal was achieved, improving sensory profiles (smoke-related aromas and flavors were less perceptible), with no saturation or carryover of phenolic glycosides. Research findings offer winemakers an improved approach to remediation of smoke tainted wine.

Indexed as

Adsorbent resinPhenolic glycoconjugatesResin regenerationSensory analysisSmoke taintVolatile phenols

Identifiers

PMID41994545
PMCPMC13081679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.