Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Community-based mental health centers in Ukraine - protocol for a mixed methods evaluation study using the RE-AIM framework.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has deepened the strain on an already fragile mental health system, long shaped by Soviet institutionalized psychiatry. In response, Ukraine has started a national reform to modernize mental health services by shifting from an institutional to a community-based mental health care model. Implementation of his transition is supported by the international technical project Mental Health for Ukraine (MH4U). Aims: To generate evidence-based evaluation of the community-based mental health centers as a basis for continued improvement and to guide national scale-up. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a mixed-methods evaluation guided by the RE-AIM framework. First, quantitative data will be collected through (a) questionnaires administered to patient's prospective longitudinal cohort at baseline, three, and six months, (b) questionnaires from providers at the baseline and in the follow-up, and (c) administrative records. Second, qualitative data will be gathered through (a) interviews with subsample of participating patients and all the providers, and (b) focus groups with community stakeholders for each oblast (administrative region). Analyses will follow the RE-AIM framework. Adhering to a learning health systems (LHS) framework, we established continuous feedback loops and workshops to communicate study findings to MH4U implementers and stakeholders in Ukraine and Switzerland. Conclusion: Evaluation will provide unique evidence on not only whether the community-based Mental Health Center model works, but also how and why it works in real-world conditions. Findings will also inform national policy on mental health reform and offer lessons for global mental health systems operating under crisis conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61471084, ISRCTN61471084.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.