ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The landscape of undergraduate public health writing instruction: a qualitative assessment.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strong writing skills are arguably the most useful and marketable trait of a graduating public health student. This study reviewed the national landscape for approaches to integrating writing skill development into undergraduate public health curricula with implications for the development of effective writing pedagogy within public health programs. Leaders of all 100 Council on Education for Public Health-accredited undergraduate public health schools, programs, and independent units in the US were invited to participate in interviews and provide information on student writing challenges. A total of 30 staff or faculty participated in this semi-structured interview between November 2022 and February 2023. Half also provided documents for additional review to complement the interviews. Information shared by interviewed participants was coded and organized into six categories by researchers: approaches, assignments, support, concepts, context, and needs. Based on interview data and complementary documents, instructional commonalities identified among programs included a wide variety of writing assignments administered in courses, such as literature reviews and needs assessments. In contrast, practices supporting student success are less varied, and frequently include repeated reading, parsing, and writing scientific articles. These activities have meaningful effects on students and are complementary to prolonged practice in managing and using citations. Many pedagogical approaches can be taken when guiding students to build those skills, including the high-impact educational practice of scaffolding. Findings were placed within a framework of considerations for writing skill instruction in undergraduate public health curricula. The developed framework has implications for improved understanding and broad-based context related to pedagogical practice of writing instruction in undergraduate public health, with implications for improved student support, faculty instruction, and bachelors program curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.