Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994510›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026

Lockdown COVID‑19: a stress test revealing more about the mental health system than psychopathology-A comparative analysis between Austria, Germany, and Italy.

Francesco de Bertoldi, Livio Finos, Pascale Roux, Davide Gaspari, Jan Di Pauli, Heiko Ullrich, Nicolas Benedetti, Jacopo Bizzarri, Johanna Neugebauer, P Peter Plum and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco de BertoldiDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.
Livio FinosDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Pascale RouxVorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Empirical Social Sciences Research Group, Dornbirn, Austria.
Davide GaspariDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.
Jan Di PauliRegional Hospital of Rankweil, Adult Psychiatry, Rankweil, Austria.
Heiko UllrichDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Siegen Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Nicolas BenedettiDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.
Jacopo BizzarriDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.
Johanna NeugebauerRegional Hospital of Rankweil, Adult Psychiatry, Rankweil, Austria.
P Peter PlumDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Siegen Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Mariateresa NittiGeriatrics Department, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.
Andreas ConcaDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bolzano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examined whether the COVID-19 pandemic produced diagnosis-specific and cross-nationally reproducible alterations in psychiatric admissions, or whether observed variations primarily reflected organizational responses. We compared psychiatric inpatient services from Austria and Germany-two hospital-centered systems with similar pre-pandemic structures-and used Italy as a contrasting community-based model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study including all psychiatric hospitalizations between 2017 and 2020. Temporal admission trends were analyzed bi-weekly for each ICD-10 diagnostic group. Generalized Linear Models (Poisson family) were used to model the effects of Diagnosis, Year (2020 vs. pre-2020), Week, and Country, and their interactions. Diagnostic categories were grouped following ICD-10, with F10 (alcohol-related disorders) analyzed separately from other substance-use disorders to capture differences between planned and emergency admissions. Results: Across Austria and Germany, 2020 was associated with a marked temporal distortion in admission patterns compared with previous years (Week × Year interaction, Conclusion: The pandemic did not induce diagnosis-specific increases in acute psychiatric admissions but substantially altered their temporal organization. Differences across countries highlight how healthcare structure-particularly the integration of territorial and inpatient services-modulates system resilience under crisis conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesQuarantineAustriaGermanyHumansItalyPsychopathologyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health policy managementpsychopathologyquarantinetemporal analysistransnational study

Identifiers

PMID41994510
PMCPMC13079170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.