ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Correlational and Regression-Based Insights into Shoulder and Core Stability Tests in Amateur Athletes: Reference Values and Sex-Based Comparison.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate correlation of core and shoulder physical tests, prediction of interdependent relationship and to develop reference values. Methodology: The study was conducted at Jinnah Sindh Medical University (JSMU), on amateur athletes: (n=70), recruited from JSMU sport society. Data were analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 23.0. Side bridge test right and left (SBTR and SBTL), flexor endurance test (FET), closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test male/female (CKCUEST-M/F) outcomes and scores of CKCUEST were analyzed with gender using independent sample t test, reference values were established. Simple and multiple linear regression of normalized CKCUEST score was analyzed with independent variables. Results: Male had significantly higher mean values on SBTR and SBTL (p<0.01*) while no significance for FET, and CKCUEST outcomes. Male had significantly higher Core Endurance Asymmetry (CEA) (p=0.024*). ER/IR strength did gives 25.1% negative correlation with CEA, whereas Normalize scores of CKC-T did give 27.9% positive correlation with CEA and 50.6% positive correlation with power scores of CKCUEST. Simple and multiple linear regression models revealed that a one unit increase in Power score of CKCUEST and CEA will give significant increase in Normalize score of CKCUEST for samples. R-square of multiple regression model showed 30% variation in Normalize score of CKCUEST was explained by the studied predictors. Conclusion: Gender alone may not determine stability and ER/IR strength ratios seems less predictive comparing core engagement and coordination for stability. CEA and power emerge as stronger predictors. CEA prevails in male.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.