Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994350›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

Outcomes comparison between catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease versus ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy - a retrospective cohort study.

Rodrigo Melo Kulchetscki, Luan Vieira Rodrigues, Cristiano Faria Pisani, Muhieddine Omar Chokr, Carina Abigail Hardy, Sissy Lara de Melo, Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thirty years of percutaneous epicardial access: reflections on the evolution of ventricular tachycardia substrate mapping and ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rodrigo Melo KulchetsckiElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Luan Vieira RodriguesElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiano Faria PisaniElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Muhieddine Omar ChokrElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Carina Abigail HardyElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sissy Lara de MeloElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Maurício Ibrahim ScanavaccaElectrophysiology Laboratory, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChC) is associated with a high burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but long-term outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in this population remain poorly characterized, especially when compared to other cardiomyopathies. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation for sustained monomorphic VT (2011-2020) at a tertiary hospital in Brazil, grouped as ChC (n = 164), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM; n = 76) or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; n = 48). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation, or VT recurrence; time-to-event outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models, and VT recurrence was additionally evaluated using Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses. Findings: We analysed 378 VT ablation procedures in 288 patients (mean age 61 ± 10 years; 208 [72%] male, 80 [28%] female; mean LVEF 35 ± 11%). Compared with ICM and idiopathic DCM, ChC more often required epicardial access (78% versus 15% in ICM and 31% in DCM; p < 0.001) and had lower acute non-inducibility (46% versus 62% in ICM; p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 29.0 months (IQR 3.3-69.1), for the last procedure the composite endpoint (death, heart transplant, or VT recurrence) occurred in 71.9% of ChC, 48.6% of ICM, and 58.3% of DCM (overall p = 0.068; pairwise ChC versus ICM p = 0.028). In adjusted Cox models, ChC was associated with higher risk of the composite endpoint (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.16-2.59; p = 0.008) and higher all-cause mortality (HR 2.41, 1.00-5.78; p = 0.049), but not for VT recurrence, which did not differ by etiology in Kaplan-Meier or competing-risk analyses (Fine-Gray: last procedure p = 0.824; first procedure p = 0.305). Overall mortality was higher in ChC than non-ChC (36.0% versus 21.7%; p = 0.034), driven largely by non-cardiovascular death (p = 0.047) rather than cardiovascular death (p = 0.134). For the composite endpoint, higher LVEF was protective (per 1% increase: HR 0.97, 0.95-0.99; p = 0.017), while major intraprocedural complications conferred the greatest risk (HR 13.70, 3.27-57.39; p < 0.001). Interpretation: Chagas cardiomyopathy was associated with worse adjusted long-term outcomes after VT ablation-driven primarily by higher mortality. Across models, higher LVEF was protective, while markers of clinical instability and major intraprocedural complications identified patients at highest risk. These findings underscore the need for meticulous procedural strategy-particularly when epicardial access is anticipated-and comprehensive post-procedural heart failure and comorbidity management in ChC. Funding: No funding was necessary for this study.

Indexed as

Catheter ablationChagas diseaseVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID41994350
PMCPMC13080599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.