ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Utility of breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images of the pancreas.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the best technique for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (FS-T2WI) of the pancreas, in terms of acquisition time and image quality, among conventional respiratory-gated turbo spin echo (RG-TSE), research breath-hold TSE with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-TSE), and research breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-HASTE). Methods: Eighty-seven patients with suspected pancreatic diseases who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between April and May 2022 were evaluated. Sixty-four focal pancreatic lesions > 5 mm were also evaluated. FS-T2WI of the pancreas were acquired with 3-T scanners using RG-TSE, BH-DL-TSE, and BH-DL-HASTE. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated image quality on a 5-point scale. We calculated the pancreas signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Friedman's test and Dunn's multiple comparisons test were performed to assess differences among the three techniques. Results: The mean acquisition time was 3 min 51 s (95 % confidence interval: 3 min and 37 s - 4 min and 6 s) for RG-TSE, 40 s for BH-DL-TSE, and 20 s for BH-DL-HASTE. BH-DL-HASTE provided the fewest artifacts and the sharpest edges (P < 0.0001), the most conspicuous main pancreatic duct (P = 0.0001 versus RG-TSE and P < 0.0001 versus BH-DL-TSE), and more conspicuous lesions than those in BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0028). There was no significant difference in the SNR (P = 0.0766). RG-TSE and BH-DL-HASTE provided a higher CNR than BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0018 and P = 0.0026, respectively). Conclusions: BH-DL-HASTE would be better than RG-TSE and BH-DL-TSE for acquiring FS-T2WI of the pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.