ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
The first report of porcine parvovirus 8 detection and genetic analysis in South Korea.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine parvoviruses (PPVs) are small, non-enveloped, single-stranded DNA viruses that infect pigs. Recently, a novel porcine parvovirus 8 (PPV8) was identified in China and subsequently detected in several countries, suggesting its global distribution. This study aimed to investigate the presence and molecular characteristics of PPV8 in Korea using diagnostic submission samples originally collected for screening of major porcine viral diseases. From October to December 2023, a total of 723 pooled samples, derived from 3,175 individual serum, nasal swab, and oral fluid samples from 40 pig farms, were screened for PPV8 by PCR. PPV8 was detected in 87.5% (35/40) of farms and 24.6% (178/723) of pooled samples, with oral fluid pools showing the highest apparent positivity. Among the 294 serum pools analyzed, PPV8 alone was detected in 10 samples (3.4%). In contrast, 45 samples showed co-detection of PPV8 with other viruses. Within these co-detected samples (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.