ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Self-management challenges and psychosocial support needs in clean intermittent catheterization: a qualitative study of individuals with neurogenic bladder and caregivers.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is widely regarded as the preferred approach to bladder management for individuals with neurogenic bladder (NB). Nevertheless, a considerable gap persists between evidence and clinical practice: patients and caregivers frequently encounter self-management barriers that compromise clinical outcomes during CIC. This qualitative study explores these barriers to provide an empirical foundation for developing tailored strategies that improve quality of care. Design: A descriptive qualitative study. Methods: From August to October 2025, a convenience sampling method was employed to recruit 16 participants individuals with NB or their long-term caregivers from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Zhangzhou Affliated Hospital of FuJian Medical University, FuJian Province. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was employed for data analysis. Results: Three themes and eight sub-themes were generated in this study: (1) Cognitive deficits and information dilemmas: barriers to health information delivery, a lack of personalized guidance, and cognitive biases and memory lapses; (2) Challenges in behavioral transformation: insufficient perception of risks and benefits and weakened self-management behaviors; (3) Need for an optimized health support system: greater access to psychological counseling, development of authoritative digital health education resources, and an integrated hospital-community management model. Conclusion: This study reveals the interconnected cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial challenges that individuals with NB and their caregivers face in practicing CIC. Our findings underscore a critical need for interventions that address these specific implementation barriers. Future initiatives should focus on developing multidimensional, patient-empowering strategies that integrate personalized digital health education, ultimately to improve the quality and sustainability of CIC self-management. Impact: This study elucidates the complex practical and psychosocial challenges encountered by individuals with NB and their caregivers during CIC. Based on these findings, we propose a multi-pronged framework for improvement, targeting cognitive, behavioral, and systemic dimensions of care. This research lays a critical foundation for designing targeted, empowerment-based interventions and offers a comprehensive, system-level roadmap to bridge the persistent evidence-practice gap in CIC self-management. Reporting method: The research adheres to Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.