ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Association between early post-resuscitation heart rate and survival with neurological recovery in a pig model of cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Heart rate (HR), a readily available clinical parameter, has proven prognostic value in cardiovascular disease and may provide similar insights following cardiac arrest. This study investigated whether post-resuscitation HR might predict functional recovery in a preclinical porcine model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: Retrospective analyses were conducted in data from earlier prospective animal studies. Ninety-six pigs successfully resuscitated after 8-12 min of ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation, followed by 5 min of CPR prior to defibrillation attempt, were included in the study. HR, arterial and central venous pressures were continuously monitored for 4 h after resuscitation. Survival with neurological function was assessed up to 96 h post-resuscitation by the optimal performance category (OPC) score, with 1-2 considered as good outcome and 3-5 as poor outcome. Results: Fifty-four animals (56%) presented a 96-h good outcome, while 42 (44%) had a poor outcome. Animals with favorable neurological outcome showed significantly lower HR during the 4-h post-resuscitation period compared with those with poor outcome ( Conclusions: In this model, lower post-resuscitation HR was independently associated with survival with favorable neurological recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.