ReviewIJTLD open2026
Safety of treatment regimens for drug-resistant TB over a 15-year period: a scoping review.
Review in IJTLD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and tolerability of linezolid to treat tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA previous review summarised the evolution and efficacy of the regimens to treat rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB), underscoring the persistent need for efficacious shorter treatments. The aim of this scoping review was to explore safety, quality of life (QoL), and unmet needs associated with RR/MDR-TB in studies published between 2009 and 2024.
methodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies reporting safety, QoL, and unmet needs in the last 15 years.
resultsFifty-seven studies including 9,874 patients were identified, with significant variation in geographic distribution, sample size, and other core variables. The overall proportion of serious adverse events (AEs) ranged between 0.2% and 10.1% in retrospective studies, 1.0%-72.4% in prospective cohorts, and 20.0%-25.0% in experimental studies, with no data on QoL. Almost all studies containing linezolid (LZD) reported gastrointestinal and haematological AEs. In studies based on individual patient data, AEs associated with bedaquiline (1.7%-2.4%) and fluoroquinolones (3%-4%) were less frequent than those associated with LZD (14.1%-17.2%). The World Health Organization 95% credible interval range was 10.1%-27.0%.
conclusionWhile efficacious RR/MDR-TB regimens are recommended, individual drugs still cause AEs potentially leading to decreased adherence. New efficacious treatments with improved safety/tolerability profiles are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.