ArticleIJTLD open2026
A mixed-method study to inform the development of long-acting injectable TB treatments.
Article in IJTLD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of TB drugs could transform global TB management. We assessed three hypothetical LAI treatment scenarios and seven product-specific characteristics among TB patients and survivors, TB clinicians, and other key stakeholders.
methodsA two-stage, mixed-method study was conducted in the Philippines. Stage 1 included semi-structured interviews with 15 key informants (KIs) from public health organisations, government, and clinical practices. Stage 2 entailed face-to-face surveys and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with TB health providers (n = 51), adult TB patients on treatment (n = 247), and TB survivors (n = 54) in one urban and one semi-urban setting.
resultsCommon themes identified through KI interviews included goals of minimising treatment burden, maximising adherence and efficacy, primary care setting preference, and the ability to monitor response. Relative to the oral standard of care, most participants reported that the LAI TB treatment scenarios were acceptable. Body placement of the injection was a driving characteristic of treatment choice for patients; preference for LAI treatment delivered through a primary care setting was reported as positively influencing treatment choice across respondent types.
conclusionMulti-setting stakeholder input should guide development of LAI TB treatment so that developers can aim for acceptable product characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.