ArticleClinical case reports2026
Sent-Induced Coronary Stenosis in a Previously Noncritical Segment Following PCI: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with stenting are standard in treating coronary artery disease, rare complications such as stent-induced de novo stenosis can paradoxically provoke acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We present the case of a 48-year-old female (Middle Eastern descent) with a recent history of coronary angioplasty, who presented with ACS 2 months post-procedure. Coronary angiography revealed critical stenosis in the left main (LM), a previously noncritical segment. Additionally, there was significant in-stent restenosis in the previously deployed stents in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries. This recurrent scenario of stenosis development in non-stented regions following stent placement suggests the need to explore underlying hypersensitivity reactions as one of several possible mechanisms. Further investigation into the mechanisms, whether immunological or atherosclerotic, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.