Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994111›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Estimating Magnetic Field at Joint Centers Reduces Kinematic Errors in Inertial Motion Capture.

Six Skov, Keenon Werling, Johanna O'Day, Jennifer Hicks, C Karen Liu, Scott Delp

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Six SkovDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3513-1185
Keenon WerlingDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Johanna O'DayDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Jennifer HicksDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
C Karen LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Scott DelpDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
AddBiomechanics: Automatic Processing and Sharing of Human Movement DataR01LM014154 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Cheng-yun Karen Liu · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are widely used to measure human motion, but accuracy remains inferior to gold-standard optical motion capture. Traditionally, researchers estimate joint angles from IMUs using global sensor fusion methods that assume the measured acceleration is gravity and the measured magnetic field is magnetic north. However, these assumptions are frequently violated, when linear accelerations are significant and magnetic fields are distorted. Recent magnetometer-free methods improve accuracy by replacing the gravity assumption with a more dynamically consistent assumption of a shared acceleration at the joint center, but these methods are prone to drift error. To improve accuracy, we developed the Magnetic Field at Inertial Joint Center (MAJIC) filter, which leverages both the common acceleration and magnetic field at a joint center. The magnetic field is adaptively included when necessary to reduce drift. We evaluated the MAJIC filter's estimated lower extremity joint kinematics against optical motion capture for 11 participants performing 20 minutes of ambulation tasks. The MAJIC filter produced joint angles with a median root mean squared error (RMSE) of 7.1°, compared to global sensor fusion methods (9.3°) and recent magnetometer-free methods (7.5°). The MAJIC filter also had a smaller range of RMSEs over all joints (5.5° to 11.4°) compared to global fusion methods (6.4° to 22.8°) and magnetometer-free methods (4.9° to 20.5°). We hope these improvements, and the open-source implementation of this filter, advance the measurement of human motion outside of the laboratory.

Indexed as

Gait analysisInertial measurement unitJoint anglesKalman filterKinematics

Identifiers

PMID41994111
PMCPMC13082144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.