SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Long-term effects of plant vs. animal protein supplementation on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have yielded mixed results on the effects of supplementing with plant-based protein (PBP) isolates or concentrates vs. animal-based protein (ABP) on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Consequently, it would be helpful to synthesize pooled evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on these parameters to assess the efficacy of different protein sources, particularly in the long term. Objective: To assess the long-term effects (≥ 6 months) of PBP compared to ABP supplementation on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults aged 18 and older. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 25 February 2025. Relevant studies were also searched by citation tracing. RCTs comparing PBP with ABP supplementation for at least 6 months were included. A random effects model was employed for data pooling. The overall effect estimate was presented using standardized mean difference (SMD) accompanied by a forest plot and prediction intervals. Results: A total of 18 RCTs involving 1,893 participants met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. In adults aged 18 years and older, long-term supplementation of PBP (largely soy protein) did not show statistically significant differences in lean body mass (LBM), fat mass (FM), total body mass (TBM), upper and lower muscle strength, gait speed (GS), chair stand test (CST), timed up and go (TUG) test, short physical performance battery (SPPB), lipid profiles, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting blood insulin (FBI), and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) for insulin resistance compared with ABP. Conclusion: Long-term supplementation with PBP, compared with ABP, did not result in differences in body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, or cardiometabolic risk parameters in the adult population. Based on heterogeneity, the data dot provide clear evidence of differences observed between protein sources at present, as long as an adequate quantity of protein is consumed over time. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Identifier CRD42024604240.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.