Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994023›Full record

ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2026

A review of established and new developments in local therapies for liver cancer.

P Seda, R Abbey, L Peng, I Ezeaku, S T Laroia, H Aziz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P SedaDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, USA.
R AbbeyCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
L PengCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
I EzeakuSurgical Recovery and Perfusion Department, Gift of Hope Organ and Tissue Donor Network, Itasca, USA.
S T LaroiaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, USA.
H AzizDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which accounts for ∼75%-85% of primary liver cancers, remains a major global health challenge. Because of its high incidence, late diagnosis, and limited curative options, local therapies have become increasingly popular for the multidisciplinary management of HCC, especially in early and intermediate Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages or in medically inoperable patients. This review examines a landscape of local treatment modalities for HCC encompassing radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation, histotripsy, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also highlight their respective advantages and disadvantages, compare their survival outcomes, and identify current gaps in the literature, including the need for further comparisons between safety profiles and efficacy, and the growing landscape that is using different local therapies in a sequential or combinatorial fashion. Emphasis is placed on treatment decisions tailored to tumor burden, liver function, and patient-specific considerations. Expanding access to advanced local therapies in resource-limited settings remains a global priority.

Indexed as

liver cancerlocoregional therapyradiotherapytargeted treatment immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41994023
PMCPMC13080930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.