Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993995›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026

Concordance between different methods of detecting fungal-specific IgE antibody in asthma.

Nadya Shifani, David W Denning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadya ShifaniManchester Fungal Infection Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Core Technology Facility, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David W DenningManchester Fungal Infection Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Core Technology Facility, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Documenting fungal sensitization plays a pivotal diagnostic role in asthma endotypes. Diagnosis relies heavily on detecting fungal-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), yet variability in allergen representation, cross-reactivity, and assay performance complicates standardization. Although ImmunoCAP is regarded as the reference method, many commercial kits are available worldwide, with varying accuracy. A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest MEDLINE identified studies comparing fungal sIgE detection kits. Inclusion criteria required human studies evaluating fungal allergens in asthma-related diseases. Data from 16 eligible studies and 32 diagnostic kits were analyzed, focusing on assay characteristics, concordance, sensitivity, and specificity. There are 32 commercial kits available, which vary in detection principles, including enzyme immunoassays, immunoblots, and microarrays, with positivity thresholds ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 kUA/L. Most assays identified

Indexed as

commercial kitsconcordancefungal asthmafungal sIgEspecific IgE

Identifiers

PMID41993995
PMCPMC13079675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.