ArticleCase reports in urology2026
Testicular Compartment Syndrome Post Bilateral Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Case Report and Review of the Current Literature.
Article in Case reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Testicular Compartment Syndrome Post Bilateral Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Case Report and Review of the Current Literature.Case reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Testicular compartment syndrome (TCS) is a rare phenomenon with around 14 cases reported in the literature. It occurs when extraluminal compression or increased venous resistance leads to raised intratesticular pressure. The fibrous tunica albuginea covering the testes does not distend, meaning the pressure is not relieved and compartment syndrome can develop. The ensuing reduction in perfusion and subsequent reperfusion injury can compromise testicular viability, making prompt identification and early surgical intervention essential in optimising outcomes. Case Presentation: A 41-year-old male presented to the emergency department with acute severe bilateral testicular pain 1 day after bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for primary infertility and azoospermia. He reported a gradual onset of bilateral testicular pain throughout the day accompanied by oozing and bleeding from the surgical wound. The pain escalated with time, and both testicles were exquisitely tender on palpation. Ultrasonography (US) demonstrated diffuse scrotal sac thickening, heterogenous testicles with hyperaemia on Doppler flow and bilateral hyperaemic enlargement of both epididymi. Thus, an emergency scrotal exploration was performed with evacuation of a left intratesticular haematoma and a right peritesticular haematoma. This restored perfusion to both testes and the patient had an uneventful postoperative course. A follow-up US after 6 weeks revealed both testicles had a reduction in volume and reduced blood flow. Conclusion: TCS is a previously undocumented complication of mTESE that should be considered in any patient presenting with pain out of proportion to clinical findings. Although the diagnosis is primarily clinical, US features, such as initial hyperaemia progressing to reduced blood flow, can support the diagnosis. Early surgical intervention to decompress the testis by incising the tunica layers is critical to reduce intratesticular pressure, restore perfusion and preserve testicular viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.