Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993947›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026

Design strategies for flexible core biopsy needles: insights from patent literature.

Nynke M Ansems, Dalibor Vasilic, Paul Breedveld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nynke M AnsemsDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Dalibor VasilicDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Paul BreedveldDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible biopsy needles are essential for minimally invasive cancer diagnostics, enabling core biopsy sampling through endoscopic and catheter-based procedures. These approaches allow clinicians to access deep-seated or anatomically challenging lesions while reducing patient risk compared to traditional percutaneous methods. However, the shift toward minimally invasive techniques imposes competing design demands on the biopsy needle tip, which must be miniaturized and flexible enough to navigate narrow lumens while maintaining cutting efficiency and retaining adequate tissue samples for clinical diagnosis. This review presents a patent-based analysis of flexible core biopsy needle designs, focusing on mechanisms at the needle tip that govern tissue cutting and retention. We systematically evaluated 65 international patent applications and developed a classification framework for cutting and gripping strategies. Using this framework, we identified dominant technological trends and highlighted underexplored concepts. Forward-cutting tips combined with suction or macroshape grips that engage the sample from the front dominate current designs due to their mechanical simplicity. However, alternative approaches such as compliant tip designs and multidirectional cutting mechanisms offer opportunities to enhance tissue yield without increasing device diameter. Implementing these innovations could reduce the need for repeated insertions, improve sampling efficiency, and enable access to lesions previously considered unreachable. This review provides an overview of flexible core biopsy needle designs and offers insights to guide future innovations that advance minimally invasive cancer diagnostics.

Indexed as

biopsy needle tipcatheter-based biopsycore biopsyendoscopic biopsyflexible biopsy needlemedical device designminimally invasive cancer diagnosticspatent analysis

Identifiers

PMID41993947
PMCPMC13079630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.