ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
The experience of professional identity formation by palliative care practitioners: an exploratory qualitative study by the Singapore Hospice Council.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Professional identity formation (PIF), the process through which professionals internalise and reconcile new experiences with a pre-existing identity can lead to better patient care outcomes and staff fulfilment. However, how palliative care practitioners (PCPs) experience PIF is currently unclear. To support services as they expand capacity to cope with increasing needs, this study addresses the question, How is professional identity formation experienced by palliative care providers in Singapore?" Methods: This exploratory qualitative study investigates how PIF is experienced by PCPs through a Relativist ontological position and a Constructivist epistemological lens. A total of seven focus group discussions involving 35 representatives from 19 member organisations of the Singapore Hospice Council (SHC) were conducted between August and September 2024. Each session lasted approximately 1-1.5 h. The data was audio-recorded, anonymised, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Results: Three themes and 7 subthemes are identified. The three themes are: prevailing professional identity of PCPs, dilemma between professional self-sufficiency and interprofessional collaboration, and expectations of leadership. Conclusion: This study elicited a self-reported, multi-faceted description of professional identity by local PCPs. PCPs' expectations of their professional competence, together with insights about how interprofessional collaboration is practiced and expectations of organisational leadership reinforce the need to adopt a multi-pronged approach towards staff support. Such an approach should include developing PCPs' competence across both biomedical and psychosocial domains, foster IPC practices that translate to staff support, and alignment of organisational goals with service realities. Future research should evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of such approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.