Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993906›Full record

ReviewJournal of parasitology research2026

Congenital and Neonatal Malaria in Ethiopia: A Narrative Review.

Yemane Leake, Hindeya Hailu Hagos, Birhanu Kassie Reta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yemane LeakeDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia, aku.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0295-1730
Hindeya Hailu HagosDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia, aku.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9373-6504
Birhanu Kassie RetaDepartment of Pathology, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia, aku.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1897-9072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malaria remains a major public health problem in Ethiopia. Congenital malaria results from transplacental transmission of malaria parasites from mother to fetus before or during delivery, whereas neonatal malaria is acquired after birth, typically through mosquito bites within the first 28 days of life. Both conditions are associated with significant neonatal morbidity and mortality in endemic settings. Despite Ethiopia's high malaria burden, evidence on congenital and neonatal malaria remains fragmented and limited. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes the existing literature on congenital and neonatal malaria in Ethiopia, highlighting epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention, with the aim of informing clinical practice and guiding future research. Methods: Published studies reporting congenital and neonatal malaria in Ethiopia were identified through searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and grey literature sources. Evidence was synthesized narratively, with emphasis on patterns, themes, and clinical implications. All eligible studies identified through PRISMA-guided screening were incorporated into the synthesis. Results: Ten studies conducted in Ethiopia reported a total of 46 cases of congenital and neonatal malaria. Conclusion: Congenital and neonatal malaria in Ethiopia are under recognized despite the country's substantial malaria burden.

Indexed as

congenital malariaEthiopiamalarianarrative reviewneonatal malarianeonate

Identifiers

PMID41993906
PMCPMC13080498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.