ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Quality-of-life assessment in autistic adults with lower support needs: gaps and emerging challenges.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) has become a key construct in the planning of support for people with disabilities. In the case of autism spectrum disorder, particularly among adults with lower support needs, there is a notable lack of valid, sensitive, and culturally adapted tools to assess their well-being. Although this group often presents a functional cognitive and linguistic profile, they experience significant-and frequently overlooked-challenges in areas such as emotional regulation, social interaction, access to services, and community participation, all of which substantially impact their QoL. This mini-review examines the current state of knowledge in this field, addressing (1) conceptual models of QoL relevant to disability; (2) the main clinical, personal, and contextual determinants of QoL in adults with autism; (3) the limitations of currently available QoL instruments; and (4) the urgent need for new methodological developments participatory and sensitive to the specificities of autistic experience. Conceptual, psychometric, and representativeness gaps are identified, particularly regarding the additional challenges faced by women, people with diverse gender identities, and other groups historically underrepresented in autism research. In this regard, the present work highlights the need to advance toward more inclusive assessment models, sensitive to the profiles of individuals with autism without intellectual disability-grounded in participatory approaches that acknowledge the intersection of autism, gender, and other dimensions of diversity. The aim is to foster a more accurate understanding of well-being in this population and to advance person-centered practices and interventions that are more appropriately tailored to their specific and unique needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.