ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Asking for help: the development of a simulation-based mental health application to enhance depression literacy, mental health communication, and help-seeking among Black autistic youth.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Black autistic youth experience disproportionately high rates of depression and face intersecting barriers such as racial discrimination, stigma, and limited access to care, yet few interventions address their needs. This study introduces Asking for Help (A4H), a culturally responsive, simulation-based intervention designed to improve depression literacy and help-seeking skills through an e-learning module and interactive conversation practice. Guided by mental health literacy theory, the Theory of Help-Seeking Behavior, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Disability Critical Theory, A4H was developed using community-engaged and user-centered design principles. Usability testing employed a mixed-methods design with 32 participants (12 youth, 10 caregivers, 8 specialists) using the System Usability Scale (SUS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and semi-structured interviews. Black autistic youth reported moderate depressive symptoms (mean PHQ-9 = 14.7) and rated usability slightly below benchmark (mean SUS = 66.2), while caregivers and specialists scored higher (73.5 and 71.0). Qualitative feedback highlighted cultural relevance and immediate feedback as strengths, with recommendations for simplified language, improved navigation, and multimodal supports; emotional safety and trust were critical for engagement. No short-term symptom change was observed, consistent with the formative design. Findings indicate A4H is feasible and culturally responsive but requires refinements before efficacy testing to assess impacts on literacy, help-seeking intentions, and communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.