ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Psychological Climate Scale among nuclear emergency responders.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To translate and culturally adapt the Psychological Climate Scale into Chinese and to examine its reliability and validity among nuclear emergency responders, thereby providing a reliable instrument for assessing their organizational psychological climate. Methods: The Brislin translation-back-translation model was employed to translate and culturally adapt the Psychological Climate Scale. Following expert consultation and a pilot study, a Chinese version of the scale was developed. A total of 286 nuclear emergency responders from three provinces (Beijing, Hunan, and Yunnan) were recruited to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The final Chinese version comprised 18 items across two dimensions. The overall Cronbach's Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Psychological Climate Scale demonstrated good reliability and validity among nuclear emergency responders. The instrument provides a useful tool for assessing psychological climate in this population and may offer an empirical basis for organizational support strategies and targeted psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.