ArticleISME communications2026
The metatranscriptomic response of the wheat rhizosphere to drought varies with growth stages.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant stress physiology under environmental emerging contaminant exposure: from molecular responses to phytoremediation applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbes can help plant sustain abiotic stresses, such as drought. Plant-microbe interactions are, however, dynamic and the timing of the stress will affect both partners, directly and indirectly. Here, we hypothesize that the effect of drought stress on the wheat rhizosphere microbiome would change between key growth stages. We grew wheat in pots and reduced soil water content for two weeks at stem elongation, booting, or heading. We then sampled the rhizosphere soil and sequenced its metatranscriptome. The timing of the drought strongly affected the transcriptional response of the microbes, but few differentially abundant transcripts were shared across all stages. Some common patterns were, however, observed at higher taxonomical or functional levels. Drought also affected the normal succession across wheat growth stages. Many of the differentially abundant transcripts, taxa, and functions between growth stages of the control plants were not significant anymore for plants that experienced drought. Our results suggest that the timing of the drought event is paramount to the microbial rhizosphere communities and that it could explain the heightened sensitivity of younger plants to stresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.